Richard Kissell's previous e-mail from about 2 years ago:

Pretty flimsly evidence which you offer considering the myriad proof texts the Professor has offered in his lenghty books and articles.

Better get out the shovel and hoe, and stop whining.

RVK 
Watertown, NY

Apparently he had the same attitude then as he has now.  No evidence or argument provided.  Just bitchiness.  Apparently he thinks, like Bacchiocchi does, that I have only the mentality for gardening.  Sad that that is from a supposed Christian, but enlightening.  That is what many of the Saturday lot do when confronted with evidence they don't like.  Again, Bacchiocchi's Gregorian Controversy.  And here's a lengthy debate with Bacchiocchi that shows up a lot of his theological problems.  More here.

Richard Kissell of Watertown, New York, wrote the following to me:

Your argument is based on three spurious accounts, while Dr. Bacchiocci's book lists dozens of examples from the Vatican Archives, and others. (re. "From Sabbath To Sunday")

It's a good time of year to plant some mums doc.

Richard Kissell
Watertown,N.Y.

P.S.  I am not a member of the Adventist Church.  Just a long time student of the Bible.

No, they are not spurious accounts.  They are quite genuine, according to historians.  Bacchiocchi's interpretation is flawed, as has been pointed out by plenty of others.  Where he cannot claim they are spurious, he plays them down, interpreting them the way he must in order to promote his point.  The Vatican has even brought his credentials into question.

As for snide remarks, Kissell and Bacchiocchi seem to have much in common.  Not the same denomination, but birds of a feather.