<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Catholicism</title>
  <tagline>News and views on Catholic issues</tagline>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2</id>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog" /> 
  <copyright>Copyright (c) http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog</copyright>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[A way towards better understanding?]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/103/A-way-towards-better-understanding"/>
  <issued>2005-08-08T23:22:26+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/103</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>On the Lutheran <strong><em>Here We Stand</em></strong> blog, there is <a href="http://metalutheran.blogspot.com/2005/08/philosophy.html" target="_blank">a brilliant post on philosophy</a> and the way in which misunderstandings affect how we are able to understand the views of others.</p>
<p><em><font color="#006600">"Kant is to conservative evangelicalism (Reformed, Baptist and Lutheran) what Aristotle is to Tridentine Catholicism. We equate Kantian and/or positivist philosophy with truth as instinctively, deeply, and foundationally as the scholastics equated Aristotle's metaphysics with reality. ...</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#006600">Saying something clearly Not-Aristotle doesn't ring as Not-Aristotle in their ears, it sounds simply Obvioustly-Not-True, and you're undermining our whole ability to speak intelligibly about the real world. It's not seen as Aristotle vs Competing Metaphysical Systems, it's The Way Things Are vs Incoherent Babbling ...</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#006600">We're the same way with Kant. In the thoroughly modernist mind, if you take issue with Kantian (and later ueber-Kantian) definitions of truth and fiction, his epistemology, his entire approach to language, etc, you're not contradicting Kant per se. You are simply speaking nonsense at best and outright lies at worst, and you're undermining our whole ability to make intelligible statements about truth."</font></em></p>
<p>This is something I've felt for a long time ... but I don't have the training or background knowledge of philosophy to put it so eloquently.&nbsp; I kant even spell Aristotle unless I cut and paste.</p>
<p>Seriously ... I've seen many areas where I believe there is not a real difference in belief, but rather a difference in the language and way of thinking behind it.&nbsp; I think this could go a long way in bringing Christians back together.&nbsp; Maybe this is what the ecumenical movement needs? </p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/103/A-way-towards-better-understanding" title="A way towards better understanding?"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Quote for the day (8-1-05)]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/101/Quote-for-the-day-8105"/>
  <issued>2005-08-07T14:20:52+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/101</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/il/orthquote/" target="_blank">Orthodox quote for the day</a></p>
<p>From Soren Kierkegaard - Provocations, Chapter 21; Plough Publishing pgs.77-78:</p>
<p>"...many have doubted. And there have been those who felt obliged to refute their doubt with reasons. But these reasons backfire and foster a doubt that gets stronger and stronger. Why? Because demonstrating the truth of Christianity does not lie in reasons but in imitation: what resembles the truth... Without a life of imitation, of following Christ, it is impossible to gain mastery over doubts. We cannot stop doubt with reasons. Those who try have not learned that it is wasted effort. They do not understand that imitation is the only force that... can break up the mob of doubts and... compel them to go home and hold their tongues."]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/101/Quote-for-the-day-8105" title="Quote for the day (8-1-05)"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Evolution and Catholic Answers]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/100/Evolution-and-Catholic-Answers"/>
  <issued>2005-08-07T07:38:27+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/100</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=63465" target="_blank">Catholic Answers forum has a poll on evolution and creation</a> - 7 days vs intelligent design vs Darwinian evolution.</p>
<p>The definitions:</p>
<p>1) 7 Day Creation: The Biblical account of Creation is literally true.</p>
<p><font color="#ff0000">2) Intelligent Design: God used Natural Forces to Create the Universe and Life over a long period of time.&nbsp; </font><font color="#000000">&lt;-- My vote</font></p>
<p>3) Darwinian Evolution: The Origins of the Universe can be atributed to Natural Causes alone and not to any Higher Power.]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/100/Evolution-and-Catholic-Answers" title="Evolution and Catholic Answers"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Our Lady of All Nations Who Once Was Mary]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/99/Our-Lady-of-All-Nations-Who-Once-Was-Mary"/>
  <issued>2005-08-07T07:21:28+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/99</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>"Our Lady of All Nations Who Once Was Mary" is a title that <a href="http://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/our_lady_of_all_nations.htm" target="_blank">EWTN defends on their site</a>, but the CDF seems to have disallowed.</p>
<p>Is EWTN wrong in this?&nbsp; It would seem so.</p>
<p><a href="http://catholiclight.stblogs.org/archives/2005/08/cdf_caution_abo.html" target="_blank">CDF text quoted from the Catholic Light blog</a>:</p>
<p><em><font color="#006600">Abp. Angelo Amato, SDB, the secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, wrote on May 20:</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#006600">With regard to the devotion known as 'Lady of All Nations' and the Marian apparitions experienced by the late visionary Ida Peerdeman, I wish to advise Your Excellency that although the said apparitions have received approval from His Excellency the Most Rev. Joseph Maria Punt, Bishop of Haarlem (Holland), in his Communications of 31 May 2002, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has expressed concern regarding one particular aspect of that devotion whereby official prayers invoke the Blessed Virgin as Lady of All Nations 'who was once Mary'.....[The CDF] does not permit any Catholic community of Christ's Faithful to pray to the Mother of God under the title of 'Lady of All Nations' with the added expression 'who was once Mary'.</font></em>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/99/Our-Lady-of-All-Nations-Who-Once-Was-Mary" title="Our Lady of All Nations Who Once Was Mary"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Evangelicals &amp; Catholics Together]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/92/Evangelicals--Catholics-Together"/>
  <issued>2005-08-05T23:21:51+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/92</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>From ReligiousNewsBlog.com, "<a href="http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11871" target="_blank">Evangelicals and Catholics: The old edginess fading</a>"</p>
<p><font color="#006600"><em>Evangelical Protestants and Roman Catholics -- the nation's two largest religious blocs -- have a relationship that's been marked in the past by hostility and tension.</em></font></p>
<p><font color="#006600"><em>But now, almost 500 years after Martin Luther, one of the top U.S. evangelical thinkers has co-authored a book that finds an increasingly warm relationship between Catholics and evangelicals.</em></font></p>
<p>At the end:</p>
<p><font color="#006600"><em>Yet both Noll and Shea believe the evangelicals are much closer to Catholicism on central Christian teachings than more liberal Protestants.</em></font></p>
<p><font color="#006600"><em>So, does that mean the Reformation is over? Noll summarizes: "The answer is not yes, but it's moving in the direction of yes."</em></font></p>
<p>See also Richard John Neuhas' and Charles Colson's efforts in dialogue at<br /><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9405/articles/mission.html" target="_blank">Evangelicals &amp; Catholics Together: The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium</a>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/92/Evangelicals--Catholics-Together" title="Evangelicals &amp; Catholics Together"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[The Ambrosian Rite]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/88/The-Ambrosian-Rite"/>
  <issued>2005-08-05T22:21:30+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/88</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thenewliturgicalmovement.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">I just found this great new blog on the Liturgy.</a></p>
<p>I really enjoy the Eastern liturgies, although I have only been to two different rites myself (Maronite Catholic and Malankaran Orthodox.)&nbsp; They seem to have a spirituality that one misses in the services one grows accustomed to ... or maybe there is something that could be improved in the Western liturgy, or something to be returned to.</p>
<p>Anyway, this article is about the Ambrosian Rite, a Western Rite associated with Milan.&nbsp; See also the Catholic Encyclopedia on the <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01394a.htm" target="_blank">Ambrosian Rite</a>, on <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13064b.htm" target="_blank">Rites in general</a>, and the <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05230a.htm" target="_blank">Eastern Churches</a>.</p>
<p>See also my website's page for the <a href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/eastern.html" target="_blank">Eastern Catholics</a>.]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/88/The-Ambrosian-Rite" title="The Ambrosian Rite"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Pilgrimage to the Eternal City]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/85/Pilgrimage-to-the-Eternal-City"/>
  <issued>2005-08-05T20:53:15+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/85</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.rian.ru/culture/20050801/41070298.html" target="_blank">Orthodox-Catholic documentary to foster inter-Christian dialogue</a></p>
<p><em>"Moscow, August 1 (RIA Novosti, Olga Lipich) - "Pilgrimage to the Eternal City," an Orthodox-Catholic film production about early Christians in ancient Rome, will help bring the two churches closer together, a spokesman for the Russian Orthodox Church said Monday."</em>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/85/Pilgrimage-to-the-Eternal-City" title="Pilgrimage to the Eternal City"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Creationism rift opens within The Vatican]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/84/Creationism-rift-opens-within-The-Vatican"/>
  <issued>2005-08-05T19:41:41+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/84</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7801&amp;feedId=online-news_rss20" target="_blank">Creationism rift opens within The Vatican</a></p>
<p>17:50 05 August 2005 - NewScientist.com news service - Shaoni Bhattacharya </p>
<p><em>"A deep rift has opened within the Catholic church over the theory of evolution and its compatibility with the Christian faith.</em></p>
<p><em>The Vatican’s chief astronomer, George Coyne, has rebuffed controversial comments made by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn in The New York Times on 7 July that evolution is incompatible with a belief in God."</em>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/84/Creationism-rift-opens-within-The-Vatican" title="Creationism rift opens within The Vatican"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Two views on Sacraments - What God does, or what we do]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/80/Two-views-on-Sacraments--What-God-does-or-what-we-do"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T15:22:18+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/80</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://historeo.com/wordpress/?p=336" target="_blank">Sacraments: Two Views, by Alamo Bill</a></p>
<p><em><font color="#009900">"Baptism and the Lord’s Supper can be viewed with two emphases: (1) what God does, or (2) what humans do. The first view understands baptism and the Lord’s Supper as “sacraments.” The latter view sees them solely as “memorials.” “Memorialism” has some interesting consequences ..."</font></em></p>
<p>Catholics view the sacraments as things done by God for man.&nbsp; This is a major one of several reasons why many Protestants do not understand Catholic sacrements and sacramentals.&nbsp; They see them as works Catholics do to get to heaven - and that is not Catholic teaching at all.&nbsp; Rather, through the Sacraments, works of God for man, not works of man for God, God gives us grace.</p>
<p>Biblical examples of Catholic sacramentalism:</p>
<p><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><strong>+</strong> Act 19:11-12 KJV&nbsp; </font>And God wrought special miracles by the hands of Paul:&nbsp; (12)&nbsp; So that from his body were brought unto the sick handkerchiefs or aprons, and the diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits went out of them.</font></p>
<p><strong>+</strong> Act 5:15 KJV&nbsp; <font color="#ff0000">Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them.</font></p>
<p><strong>+</strong> <font color="#000000">Jam 5:14 KJV&nbsp; </font><font color="#ff0000">Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord</font></p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/80/Two-views-on-Sacraments--What-God-does-or-what-we-do" title="Two views on Sacraments - What God does, or what we do"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[An Anglican view on Sola Scriptura]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/79/An-Anglican-view-on-Sola-Scriptura"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T15:08:00+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/79</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[Again via the <a href="http://catholica.pontifications.net/?p=1018" target="_blank">Pontificator blog</a>, I found a fascinating <a href="http://anglicanscotist.blogspot.com/2005/07/taking-your-pick.html" target="_blank">article on The Anglican Scotist blog</a> about the different views of the Bible in the Anglican Communion. ]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/79/An-Anglican-view-on-Sola-Scriptura" title="An Anglican view on Sola Scriptura"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Anglicans and the Eucharist]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/78/Anglicans-and-the-Eucharist"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T14:56:13+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/78</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catholica.pontifications.net/" target="_blank">The Pontificator blog</a> is really one of the best, and I try to keep up to date with it.&nbsp; His post called <a href="http://catholica.pontifications.net/?p=1022" target="_blank">“Symbol and Reality”</a> is about the Anglican [Episcopalian in the USA] view of the Eucharist, specifically those of Lancelot Andrewes and Alexander Schmemann, neither of whom I had heard of before this.&nbsp; Catholics explain the <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05573a.htm" target="_blank">Real Presence in terms of transubstantiation</a>, while others, including many Anglicans, use the explanation <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04322a.htm" target="_blank">consubstantiation, or impanation</a>.&nbsp; While Andrewes did not accept transubstantiation, the original blog to which Pontificator refers, <a href="http://meam-commemorationem.blogspot.com/2005/07/figura-et-res-veritas-et-figura.html" target="_blank">figura et res, veritas et figura, at the Meam Commemorationem blog</a>, says:</p>
<p><font color="#009900"><em>"There is no hiatus, the Eucharist IS the Body and Blood and the Sacrifice offered on behalf of the sins of the whole world. There is no doubt in the mind of Andrewes about the reality of the whole Christ in the Sacrament."</em></font></p>
<p>I don't have the theological background to understand all that Jeff Steel at Meam Commemorationem quotes from Schmemann regarding this issue, but it was interesting to read all the same.</p>
<p>Pontificator's comment includes the following: <font color="#009900"><em>"My one question about Schmemann's ontology of symbol is whether it truly allows the difference between an icon and the eucharistic Body and Blood. ... Hence the insistence of II Nicaea that the Eucharist is not an icon of the Body and Blood but is the Body and Blood."</em></font></p>
<p>Certainly food for thought.</p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/78/Anglicans-and-the-Eucharist" title="Anglicans and the Eucharist"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[The Reformed, &quot;No, Jesus!&quot;]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/77/The-Reformed-No-Jesus"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T14:35:39+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/77</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>Josh S has some interesting <a href="http://metalutheran.blogspot.com/2005/07/harsh-words.html" target="_blank">insights on the Eucharist in the Here We Stand blog</a>, metalutheran.blogspot.com.</p>
<p><font color="#009900"><em>[W]hen Jesus says "This is my body," the Reformed answer with "No, Jesus, you can't possibly mean that," instead of "Amen." I believe quite strongly now (Sasse's influence, maybe? ) that responding to the Words of Institution is a fundamental part of celebrating the Lord's Supper and thus why we can never celebrate with the Reformed. When the pastor says, "This is the body of Christ," the Lutheran responds with "Amen," while the Calvinist responds with "No, it's not--that's impossible!" The Reformed "no" occupies the place in the celebration that the Lutheran "yes" does. Well guess what? That's not the appropriate way to come to the Table.</em></font></p>
<p>Catholics and Lutherans might not agree completely on the nature of the Eucharist, but we're historically a lot closer than many other Christian denominations, and a better understanding is growing.</p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/77/The-Reformed-No-Jesus" title="The Reformed, &quot;No, Jesus!&quot;"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[More on the Gestapo raid]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/76/More-on-the-Gestapo-raid"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T14:26:14+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/76</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>Earlier in this blog, I referred to the <a href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/25/Gestapo-raid-on-St-Johns-Episcopal-Church-Connecticut-USA" target="_blank">Gestapo-like raid on St John's&nbsp;Episcopal Church in Connecticut</a>. There is more news:</p>
<p><span class="story-head"><a href="http://www.beaufortgazette.com/state_news/regional/story/5056038p-4609964c.html" target="_blank">Bishops plan to take Connecticut cleric to church court</a> - The Beaufort Gazette<br /><a href="http://www.wibw.com/news/headlines/1747787.html" target="_blank">Priest Removal</a> - 13News, WIBW.com</span></p>
<p><span class="story-head">Andrew Smith, the bishop of Connecticut, is being taken to a religious court by 9 other Episcopal bishops.&nbsp; The "Connecticut Six" - 1 priest who has been removed from his parish, and 5 others in danger of similar action against them - have asked to be taken under the supervision of a different bishop.</span></p>
<p><span class="story-head">The Anglican Communion is being divided on a number of issues, and we may see more dramatic splits in the future.</span></p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/76/More-on-the-Gestapo-raid" title="More on the Gestapo raid"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[The Theotokos and Protestants]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/75/The-Theotokos-and-Protestants"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T14:13:23+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/75</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>Michael Pahls has a brilliant post on his blog at <a href="http://www.reformedcatholicism.com/archives/2005/04/the_theotokos_a.html" target="_blank">Reformed Catholicism - Classically Protestant *and* Constructively catholic</a>, entitled <a href="http://www.reformedcatholicism.com/archives/2005/04/the_theotokos_a.html" target="_blank">The Theotokos and Doctrinal Criticism</a>.</p>
<p>He discusses Catholic and Orthodox Mariology (referred to as Mariolatry by anti-Catholic Protestanst) and the problems Protestantism has with them.</p>
<p><em><font color="#009900">Most Protestant difficulties with Roman Catholic and Orthodox Mariologies (not identical theologies, by the way) stem from a failure to understand the intrinsic connection between Mary and the Church. ...<br />Saying "Mary is the Mediatrix of all graces" is nearly identical to saying, "the Church is Mediatrix of all graces." ...<br />A sacramental understanding of the Church is, of course, a prerequisite for finding this teaching acceptable. For Roman Catholics, the Orthodox, Presbyterian/Reformed Christians, Lutherans, and Anglicans this should be old hat. ...<br />If it was necessary to assume Mary's physical body into heaven for her to receive an anticipatory share in the Resurrection, than the resurrection body of Jesus and of us demands an essential continuity with our present embodiment. In other words, Jesus is not merely “alive to God” in a disembodied way as more liberal Christians wish to affirm. ...<br />The only really good grounds on which Protestants might object to Roman Mariology&nbsp; ...</font></em></p>
<p><font color="#000000">See also <a href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/theotokos.html" target="_blank">my essay on the Theotokos on my website</a>.</font></p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/75/The-Theotokos-and-Protestants" title="The Theotokos and Protestants"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[More on Sola Scriptura]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/74/More-on-Sola-Scriptura"/>
  <issued>2005-07-31T13:58:54+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/74</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><font color="#000000">On his blog, Dave Armstrong once again has a good debate on Sola Scriptura.&nbsp; See </font><font color="#000000"><a href="http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005_07_24_socrates58_archive.html#112259345595566652" target="_blank">The Novel and Unbiblical Doctrine of Sola Scriptura, Part I (vs. Lutheran Steve Parks)</a><a href="http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005_07_24_socrates58_archive.html#112259345595566652" target="_blank"></a></font></p>
<p><font color="#000000">Pontificator also has a good post.&nbsp; See <a href="http://catholica.pontifications.net/?p=996" target="_blank">“Is ‘Word Alone’ An Evangelical Possibility?”</a></font></p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/74/More-on-Sola-Scriptura" title="More on Sola Scriptura"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[More on unity between East and West]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/62/More-on-unity-between-East-and-West"/>
  <issued>2005-07-24T14:04:43+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/62</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[The Pontificator blog has two interesting articles on the unification between the Eastern and Western lungs of the Church. The first is <a href="http://catholica.pontifications.net/?p=992" target="_blank">a quote from St John Maximovitch</a>, the second <a href="http://catholica.pontifications.net/?p=994" target="_blank">a quote from HH Benedict XVI, from when he was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; ]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/62/More-on-unity-between-East-and-West" title="More on unity between East and West"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Evolution again]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/60/Evolution-again"/>
  <issued>2005-07-24T07:59:55+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/60</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<a href="http://bogners.typepad.com/church/2005/07/evolution__myst.html" target="_blank">On his blogsite</a>, Steve Bogner makes some intelligent comments on the current Creation vs Evolution debate sparked off by recent comments from <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/homilies/2005/documents/hf_ben-xvi_hom_20050424_inizio-pontificato_en.html" target="_blank">HH Pope Benedict XVI (in his inaugural homily)</a> and <a href="http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0504118.htm" target="_blank">Cardinal Schonborn</a>.]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/60/Evolution-again" title="Evolution again"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Online surveys]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/58/Online-surveys"/>
  <issued>2005-07-24T06:52:25+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/58</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p>Support the Catholic Church by bringing a few Catholic votes to this predominantly anti-Catholic website's survey results.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/smilies/icon_eek.gif" alt="icon_eek" /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sermonaudio.com/survey.asp">http://www.sermonaudio.com/survey.asp</a></p>
<p>(Note: you'll have to supply a valid e-mail address and get their weekly sermon list update.) <img src="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt="icon_sad" />&nbsp; </p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/58/Online-surveys" title="Online surveys"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[Sola Scriptura]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/56/Sola-Scriptura"/>
  <issued>2005-07-24T06:04:25+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/56</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[Dave Armstrong has posted an <a href="http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005_07_17_socrates58_archive.html#112215703106983804" target="_blank">excellent list of quotes on Sola Scriptura</a>&nbsp;at&nbsp;his blog site. ]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/56/Sola-Scriptura" title="Sola Scriptura"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>
<entry>
  <title><![CDATA[A Catholic View of Eastern Orthodoxy]]></title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/55/A-Catholic-View-of-Eastern-Orthodoxy"/>
  <issued>2005-07-23T17:46:44+00:00</issued>
  <modified>2006-11-05T01:18:23+00:00</modified>
  <id>tag:www.theotokos.co.za,2006-11-05:/archives/2/55</id>
  <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog">
  <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.secondspring.co.uk/articles/nichols.htm" target="_blank">Fr Nichols, OP, has a good article</a> on the issues relating to the reunion of Orthodoxy and Catholicism.</p>
<p>For a few Eastern Catholic sites, see my <a href="http://theotokos.co.za/eastern.html" target="_blank">Eastern Catholicism page</a>. </p>]]>
  </content>
  <link rel="related" type="text/html" href="http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/catholic/55/A-Catholic-View-of-Eastern-Orthodoxy" title="A Catholic View of Eastern Orthodoxy"/>
  <author>
    <name>stephen</name>
    <url>http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/profile.php?id=1</url>
  </author>
</entry>


</feed>